GOP is running 2026 like it’s 2006, repeating George W. Bush’s Iraq War election failure

The 2026 midterm election is bearing down on Republicans. How it will turn out will be determined, in part, by whom history says controlled the narrative. Sadly, Republicans are losing that battle just as they did in 2006 when the Iraq War became the decisive issue.

After the 2004 presidential election, Republicans had a House majority of 232 seats to 202 seats held by the Democrats. After the 2006 election, that was reversed, with Democrats holding 233 seats to 202 for Republicans, with Democrats even picking up the one independent seat.

What might be surprising about that loss is that the 2006 economy was growing at 3% and there were 1.8 million new jobs added in 2006.

MIDTERM HISTORY MASSIVELY FAVORS DEMOCRATS. BUT THEY ARE MAKING A BIG MISTAKE

So, how did Republicans lose the House in that dramatic fashion in 2006? Two ways: by not controlling the narrative and failing to offer the voters a plan for the years ahead.

The dominant issue of the 2006 campaign was not the economy, it was the Iraq War. The public was weary of it and exit polls showed that 56% of Americans disapproved of it. President George W. Bush’s approval ratings were tied to that war, and he had a similar disapproval rating.

REPUBLICANS FACE BRUTAL MIDTERM HEADWINDS. SIX FORCES COULD HELP THEM DEFY HISTORY.

There was also the late-breaking Mark Foley scandal, a Republican congressman.

In the process, independent voters voted decisively for Democrats 57% to 39% in those midterms in contrast to voting slightly in favor of Republicans in 2004.

Keep in mind that the Iraq War did not result in substantial hardships for Americans as compared to prior wars such as Vietnam, Korea or the world wars.

Obviously, the Iraq War was a Middle East War far from the American homeland. Yes, gas prices did rise (sound familiar?). But they were significantly dropping by the time of the election.

FOX NEWS POLL: SQUEEZED BY COSTS, FRUSTRATED VOTERS TURN TO THE DEMOCRATS

As for the Iraq War itself, nearly 20 times as many Americans had died in the Vietnam War than had in the Iraq War by the 2006 midterms. While all troop deaths are always tragedies, that comparison is made to give context between two major wars and public perception about their gravity and losses.

To a large degree, the controlling dynamic of the 2006 election was the public’s view of the Iraq War, the Foley scandal and the lack of a Republican narrative.

REPUBLICANS NEED A REAGAN-STYLE VISION TO WIN THE BATTLE OVER AMERICA'S FUTURE

Elections, however, should never be analyzed just for what happened. They also should be analyzed for what didn’t happen. What didn’t happen in the 2006 midterms was the voters getting a forward-looking reason to vote for Republicans.

Elections are always about the future – regardless of what you have done in the past. However, in keeping with almost every midterm election in the past, the party in the White House did not present voters with a plan going forward. Republicans had no three-point plan that they promised voters they would implement if elected to take control of the House.

REPUBLICANS JUST GOT A POWERFUL NEW PLAYBOOK FOR THE BATTLE FOR CONGRESS. HERE'S WHAT'S INSIDE

Instead, they placed their hopes on a money advantage, past laurels and a sophisticated get-out-the-vote plan. In plain terms, that did not and could not result in Republicans controlling the narrative of the 2006 midterms. As a result, Republicans were defined by events and the Democrats.

Fast-forward to today, and the comparisons between 2006 and 2026 should be manifest. Today as then, Americans are in a Middle East war. Both times, Americans had grown weary of the war – although the Iraq War had been waged for nearly three years compared to just six months in 2026. Both times gas prices had risen.

FOX NEWS POWER RANKINGS: FOR THE DEMOCRATS, WHERE COULD IT POSSIBLY GO WRONG?

Today, the economy has many very bright spots, including record-low poverty rates, a manufacturing boom and strong consumer spending. Wages are outpacing inflation (unlike the Biden years) and the stock market is booming.

A good deal of the country, however, would never know it given the Divided Media Era in which we live. Worse yet, Republicans have not told voters their plan for 2027.

LIZ PEEK: AI ALARM BELLS ARE RINGING AND TRUMP NEEDS TO TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY

They have called out the Democrats and their socialist ways. However, saying the other side is bad, isn’t a forward-looking plan. Indeed, Republicans have yet to say, "Elect us to control of the House and we will do one, two and three."

As a result, Republicans have failed to control the narrative just as they did in 2006. While their losses likely won’t be as large as 2006 because of gerrymandering, Republicans should have learned from their past mistakes.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Fortunately, there is still time and there three-point plan should be:

The old saying goes, "You can’t be something with nothing." If the Republicans want to win in 2026, they need to offer something, and they need to do it now.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM TOM DEL BECARRO