Israel's Gaza church strike sparks moral debate. Is it losing support from its strongest US allies?

Israel's recent strike on a Catholic church in Gaza, which killed three civilians and injured nine, has sparked a political backlash from its most staunch allies, including evangelical Christians and American politicians, and has raised questions about the shared moral values that have historically supported Israel's support in the US.

Jul 22, 2025 - 14:00
 0  0
Israel's Gaza church strike sparks moral debate. Is it losing support from its strongest US allies?

The Israel Defense Forces struck the only Catholic church in Gaza last week. The compound of the Holy Family, which belongs to the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem, was hit at 10:20 a.m. local time. Three civilians were killed and nine others injured, including the parish priest. The Patriarchate described the attack plainly: “the targeting of innocent civilians.”

Israel, after a torrent of international criticism including from President Trump, claimed the strike was a mistake. 

But no public evidence has yet supported that explanation. Churches, of course, are not difficult to identify: cross, steeple, certain features. And no credible account has emerged explaining how this specific target was mistakenly hit. Many argue that the strike may have been an intentional form of retaliation for Christian leaders’ recent criticism of Israeli settler violence in a West Bank Christian town.

Regardless of intent, this strike is an instantiation of a political turning point. The truth is that Israel overstepped not only the line of military proportionality, but the line that keeps even its staunchest allies — American evangelical conservatives — in its corner.

That shift is visible at the top. Even Mike Huckabee, a longtime evangelical ally of Israel and U.S. ambassador to the country, has warned that Israel may be turning openly hostile toward Christians. In a pointed letter to Israel’s Interior minister, he threatened visa restrictions on Israel for blocking Christian pilgrims from entering the country.

Huckabee’s criticism matters not just because of his stature, but that he represents millions of evangelical voters who have historically provided Israel with a powerful base of bipartisan American support. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), too, voted alongside Democrats to strip Israel of $500 million in funding hours after the bombing. Another Mike, Daily Wire commentator and essential Christian Zionist Michael Knowles, reacted to the strike and said: “You're losing me. When you strike churches and start interfering with American interests… Now we’ve got a problem.”

Support for Israel in the U.S. has long rested on two legs: shared strategic interests and shared moral values. The second of those legs is buckling: not just on the left, but now, visibly, among Israel’s own evangelical base.

The political backlash already underway clearly shows that Israel’s pattern of hostility toward Christians is beginning to carry substantial consequences. Evidently, Israel’s gamble with the goodwill of its strongest political base in the U.S. has failed.

And there’s another reason why striking a church is politically self-defeating: the West may struggle to communicate empathy for Palestinian civilians, but they brought in the beacon of American conservatism: Christianity and the church. 

I say this not as someone predisposed to condemn Israel. I as a Christian was broadly supportive of Israel in the weeks following Oct. 7. Not out of ideology but because, prudentially, I believed Israel’s response to Hamas’ attacks was warranted and necessary. But I now firmly believe government of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has crossed the proportionality line with its recent food and aid blockade and relentless bombardment of civilians.

Self-evidently, Israel has gone beyond its supposed mission to eliminate Hamas and get the remaining hostages released, and now seem overshadowed by an egregiously destructive military operation. 

And just as Israel’s moral clarity has eroded, so too has the political cover once granted by its most reliable American supporters. When Israel strikes the church in Gaza they lose Michael Knowles. When Israel starts interfering with Christian pilgrims, they lose Mike Huckabee. And if they lose the Huckabee archetype, whom they rely on, then the Israeli government is badly misplaying its hand. 

In any case, an indefinite war, especially one with such a catastrophic civilian toll, cannot retain public or political support in the U.S. Still, the U.S. remains Israel’s closest ally. But that support depends on shared values. If those values begin to diverge, so too will the relationship.

William Liang is a writer living in San Francisco. His work has appeared in the Daily Wire, the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Diego Union-Tribune  and more.

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow